Trial reportRMD open2025
Nailfold capillaroscopy in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a substudy of the SENSCIS trial.
Trial report in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nailfold Videocapillaroscopy in Pediatric Rheumatology: Established Roles, Emerging Applications, and Future Perspectives.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Capillaroscopic patterns are associated with interstitial lung disease, skin fibrosis, anti-Th/To antibodies and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a prospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess microvascular changes in nailfold capillaries in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) who received nintedanib or placebo in a sub-study of the SENSCIS trial.
methodsNailfold capillaroscopy (NC) was performed at baseline and week 52. In the nintedanib and placebo groups, we measured capillary density (number of capillaries/mm), giant capillaries, abnormal shapes and percentage of fingers with microhaemorrhages. In addition, capillary density was evaluated in patients who did/did not have risk factors for rapid forced vital capacity (FVC) decline at baseline and who did/did not have ILD progression (absolute decline in FVC % predicted >5% or death) from baseline to week 52.
resultsBetween baseline and week 52, no notable changes were observed in any NC measurement in the overall placebo or nintedanib groups. In patients with risk factors for rapid FVC decline (n=38), there was a numerical reduction in mean capillary density over 52 weeks with placebo, but it remained stable with nintedanib. Among patients who had ILD progression (n=11), there was a numerical increase in mean capillary density over 52 weeks with nintedanib, but it remained stable with placebo. There were no notable changes in capillary density among patients who did not have risk factors for rapid FVC decline at baseline or ILD progression at week 52.
conclusionIn a substudy of the SENSCIS trial, numerical differences in changes in capillary density assessed by NC over 52 weeks may suggest a potential effect of nintedanib in patients at risk of ILD progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.