Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41106890›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2025

Paradoxical Hemodynamics in Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: Cardiogenic Shock and Recovery With Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Ronak Bahuva, Arminder Singh, Alejandro Chapa-Rodriguez, Vibha Hayagreev, Hardik Fichadiya, Amar Patel, Abdul Haseeb Riaz, Hafiz Sarwar, Usman Younus, Amol Bahekar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ronak BahuvaDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Arminder SinghDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Alejandro Chapa-RodriguezDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Vibha HayagreevDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Hardik FichadiyaDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Amar PatelDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Abdul Haseeb RiazDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Hafiz SarwarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Usman YounusDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
Amol BahekarDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: abahekar@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPericardial decompression syndrome is a rare but potentially fatal complication of pericardiocentesis or surgical drainage, causing paradoxical hemodynamic collapse despite technically successful fluid evacuation. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old woman with malignant pericardial effusion underwent pericardial window surgery. Four hours later, she developed refractory shock and severe left ventricular dysfunction with a Takotsubo pattern, despite nonobstructive coronary arteries. A percutaneous left ventricular assist device provided hemodynamic support. Her left ventricular function gradually recovered. DISCUSSION: Pericardial decompression syndrome may involve hemodynamic, ischemia, and autonomic pathophysiology. Mechanical circulatory support can bridge recovery in pericardial decompression syndrome complicated by stress cardiomyopathy. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Pericardial fluid drainage can paradoxically lead to cardiogenic shock given multifactorial hemodynamic and neurohormonal responses; clinicians should maintain high vigilance for hemodynamic deterioration even after technically successful drainage. Mechanical circulatory support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device can provide effective stabilization and myocardial recovery and can be lifesaving in nonischemic cardiogenic shock.

Indexed as

acute heart failurecardiac assist devicescomplicationechocardiographyhemodynamicsleft ventriclepericardial effusiontamponade

Identifiers

PMID41106890
PMCPMC12793838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.