Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
Antifracture Efficacy of 5- or 10-Yearly Zoledronate in Women Aged 50 to 60 Years: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Trial.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decreased nonvertebral fracture incidence with zoledronate use for >3 years: post hoc analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of denosumab, zoledronic acid and alendronate on bone mineral density and trabecular bone score in men with osteoporosis.Age and ageing · 2026Trial
- Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Endocrine reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextWe recently reported that zoledronate (zol) given once at baseline or twice (every 5 years) reduced fracture risk over 10 years.
objectiveWe assessed whether the effects of zol differ over time or across important baseline variables, and how they relate to changes in bone mineral density (BMD) over time.
methodsA 10-year, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, was conducted at a clinical research center from 2012 to 2023. Participants included 1054 postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 60 years, with BMD T-score at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip between 0 and -2.5. Intervention included either 5-yearly 5-mg zol (zol-zol), 5-mg zol infusion at baseline and placebo at 5 years (zol-placebo), or 5-yearly placebo (placebo-placebo). Main outcome measures included morphometric vertebral fractures, major osteoporotic, and any fractures.
resultsMorphometric vertebral fractures were not reduced in the years 0 to 5 following zol but were reduced in years 5 to 10 by 58% (95% CI, 21%-77%) (zol-zol) and 57% (21%-77%) (zol-placebo). For any fracture and major osteoporotic fracture, similar temporal patterns were observed. There were no interactions between treatment effect and baseline variables (including age, body mass index, BMD, falls or fracture history, and estimated fracture risk) or between treatment effect and changes in BMD with zol.
conclusionFracture reductions with single-dose or 5-yearly zol appear greater during years 5 to 10 than years 0 to 5. The risk reductions are broadly consistent across this cohort and independent of baseline or change in BMD. This suggests that routine BMD monitoring may not be necessary for low-risk women considering the option of less frequent zol for long-term fracture risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.