ReviewJournal of advanced research2026
Machine learning for food flavor prediction and regulation: models, data integration, and future perspectives.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Non-Destructive Sensing and Intelligent Quality Prediction During Fruit Drying: From Quality Formation to Decision Support.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Aroma evolution of Anhua Qianliang tea across different storage years: Machine learning-assisted discrimination of storage stages and screening of marker volatile compounds.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Effects of fermentation byFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Innovative Systems Biology in Baijiu Fermentation: Unveiling Omics Landscapes and Microbial Synergy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in bread making: Applications in quality control, formulation and sensory prediction.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- Rheological analysis in food processing: factors, applications, and future outlooks with machine learning integration.RSC advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFlavor is a central attribute of food quality, shaping consumer preferences and market performance. Traditional evaluation methods, such as sensory panels and basic assays, are often constrained by subjectivity, low throughput, and limited scalability. With the rise of high-throughput technologies and multimodal datasets, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool for deciphering and regulating complex flavor systems. AIM OF REVIEW: This review examines current flavor detection techniques and the application of ML across diverse domains. It compares supervised learning models (SVM, DT), ensemble algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM), and deep learning approaches (CNN, ANN). This review also discusses the contribution of three major data dimensions to flavor prediction, as well as future prospects in the field. ML enables precise flavor prediction, compound screening, and real-time process control. To support these tasks, researchers have developed integrated analytical systems that combine electronic nose (E-nose), electronic tongue (E-tongue), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Ensemble learning and deep learning models show strong performance when handling complex, nonlinear datasets. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) improve model transparency by linking predictions to underlying features. ML models further enhance both prediction accuracy and generalizability. Innovations such as attention mechanisms, graph neural networks, and digital twins support dynamic flavor modulation. ML also aids in identifying key flavor compounds and genotype-phenotype relationships, accelerating breeding and formulation. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: ML is opening up new technological avenues in flavor science, with significant potential to predict and control flavor formation mechanisms, verify product authenticity, and support the targeted design of flavor-active compounds that align with consumer expectations for sensory appeal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.