Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41106722›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2026

Machine learning for food flavor prediction and regulation: models, data integration, and future perspectives.

Xinyu Ge, Yongjie Zhou, Qing Li, Yuqing Tan, Yongkang Luo, Hui Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effects of fermentation byFood chemistry: X · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyu GeBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yongjie ZhouBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Qing LiBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yuqing TanBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yongkang LuoBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Hui HongBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China. Electronic address: hhong@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlavor is a central attribute of food quality, shaping consumer preferences and market performance. Traditional evaluation methods, such as sensory panels and basic assays, are often constrained by subjectivity, low throughput, and limited scalability. With the rise of high-throughput technologies and multimodal datasets, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool for deciphering and regulating complex flavor systems. AIM OF REVIEW: This review examines current flavor detection techniques and the application of ML across diverse domains. It compares supervised learning models (SVM, DT), ensemble algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM), and deep learning approaches (CNN, ANN). This review also discusses the contribution of three major data dimensions to flavor prediction, as well as future prospects in the field. ML enables precise flavor prediction, compound screening, and real-time process control. To support these tasks, researchers have developed integrated analytical systems that combine electronic nose (E-nose), electronic tongue (E-tongue), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Ensemble learning and deep learning models show strong performance when handling complex, nonlinear datasets. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) tools such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) improve model transparency by linking predictions to underlying features. ML models further enhance both prediction accuracy and generalizability. Innovations such as attention mechanisms, graph neural networks, and digital twins support dynamic flavor modulation. ML also aids in identifying key flavor compounds and genotype-phenotype relationships, accelerating breeding and formulation. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: ML is opening up new technological avenues in flavor science, with significant potential to predict and control flavor formation mechanisms, verify product authenticity, and support the targeted design of flavor-active compounds that align with consumer expectations for sensory appeal.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTasteData AnalyticsElectronic NoseHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsSoft ComputingExplainable AIFlavor predictionMachine learningSensory modeling

Identifiers

PMID41106722
PMCPMC13316553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.