ArticleExperimental eye research2025
Peripapillary scleral stiffening increases optic nerve head shear deformation in porcine eyes during IOP elevation.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models predicted that peripapillary sclera (PPS) stiffening may reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) induced stresses and strains at the optic nerve head (ONH). Experimental studies in animal models of glaucoma however did not confirm such benefit. In this study, we used high-resolution ultrasound elastography to quantify PPS and ONH strains to evaluate biomechanical changes associated with PPS stiffening. Sixteen pairs of porcine globes were used. One globe in each pair was randomly assigned to the stiffening or the control group. Inflation tests were performed before and after treatment with 1.25 % glutaraldehyde (stiffening group) or saline (control group). IOP was raised from 5 to 30 mmHg while 2D cross-sectional images of the PPS and ONH were obtained using a 50 MHz ultrasound probe. PPS and ONH displacements and strains were calculated using a validated ultrasound speckle tracking algorithm. In the stiffening group, there was an increase in ONH shear strain (by 11.8 %, P = 0.025) and an increase in the posterior displacement of the ONH relative to PPS (P < 0.001). In contrast, ONH shear strain decreased (by 8.1%, P=0.006) and the relative ONH posterior displacement did not change in the control group. ONH tangential strains were reduced in both groups, but more so in the stiffening group. These results suggest that the biomechanical effects of PPS stiffening are complex. While a reduction of ONH tangential strain could be protective, the concomitant increase in ONH shear strain and ONH posterior displacement could be detrimental. Future studies are needed to optimize PPS biomechanical properties for neuroprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.