ArticleHearing research2025
Study of organ of Corti motion in the guinea pig base including differential analysis of internal motion.
Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Displacement gradients in the lateral region of the organ of Corti dissipate power in the cochlea.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Broadband amplification of organ of Corti vibrations in the mouse cochlear apex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Active deformation in the basal organ of Corti in gerbil.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sensation of hearing arises from the interplay of micromechanical motion within the organ of Corti (OC). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) vibrometry has been used to examine the simultaneous motions of OC structures, including the basilar membrane (BM), outer hair cells (OHCs) and reticular lamina (RL), with gerbil and guinea pig (GP) as common animal models. Boosting (motion responses larger than passive motion), and nonlinearity at frequencies below the best frequency (sub-BF) are a robust observation within the gerbil OHC-region. Fallah et al. (2021) compared basal OC mechanics between gerbil and GP and found that GP OC motions at sub-BF frequencies were generally less boosted and showed less nonlinearity than those in gerbil. In the present work, we expand upon the GP measurements by measuring intra-OC motion through both the round window (RW) and a basal cochleostomy in the same experiment. We found substantial differences in the motions when measured through the RW versus the cochleostomy. In the OHC/Deiters Cell(DC) region, sub-BF nonlinearity and boosting were present in measurements through a cochleostomy, but not through the RW. A mild degree of sub-BF nonlinearity was present in the RL region in RW measurements, but not through the cochleostomy. The discussion proposes hypotheses for these differences, including optical angle dependency and mechanical perturbation. Finally, a complex difference analysis was used to extract the internal motion of OC structures riding on the BM motion. The stimulus-level-dependence of the internal OC motions was reduced in the phase responses and increased in the amplitude responses compared to the directly measured OC motion, and irregularities such as nonmonotonic scaling in the measured motion were not present in the extracted internal motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.