ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2026
Addressing Stuttering Variability in Assessment and Treatment: Perspectives of Speech-Language Pathologists.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) observe and address variability in stuttering assessment and treatment. Variability was examined in observable overt stuttering behaviors and beyond, encompassing the emotions, beliefs, and behaviors associated with stuttering, as well as speakers' ability to engage in daily activities and participate fully in their lives. The overarching goal of the study was to identify strategies for ensuring that variability is appropriately accounted for in clinical work related to stuttering.
methodThe study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data collected through an online survey from 143 U.S.-based SLPs, including generalists (
resultsBoth generalists and stuttering experts reported that they consistently observe variability across all aspects of stuttering. For overt behaviors, 100% of both groups noted variability. In reactions to stuttering, 96.3% of generalists and 100% of stuttering experts observed variability. Variability in daily participation was reported by 91.3% of generalists and 96% of stuttering experts. Thematic analysis revealed that stuttering variability is highly individualized, influencing overt behaviors, emotional responses, and daily participation, with SLPs emphasizing comprehensive assessments, tailored treatments, and education to address its challenges and opportunities. While both groups observed and addressed variability, generalists focused more on observable behaviors, whereas experts emphasized other aspects of the stuttering experience using a more holistic approach.
conclusionsEffectively addressing the variability of stuttering requires comprehensive, context-sensitive strategies that address the broad experience of stuttering. By tailoring interventions to individual needs and fostering resilience related to variability, clinicians can improve outcomes for people who stutter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.