ArticlePloS one2025
A multicriteria model for prioritizing 5G network deployment with Monte Carlo stability analysis: A case study in Magdalena, Colombia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global deployment of 5G mobile networks has followed a progressive and strategic approach, depending on regional characteristics. This study develops a reference framework to prioritize areas for deployment, considering technical, sociodemographic, geographic, and economic criteria. The methodology integrates multi-criteria decision-making techniques such as AHP, CRITIC, TOPSIS, and SAW to evaluate and prioritize alternatives. This framework was applied to the municipalities of the Magdalena department in Colombia. The AHP results indicate that technical criteria are the most relevant in the selection process, with a weight of 34.3%, followed by sociodemographic criteria at 33.6%, geographic criteria at 19.47%, and economic criteria at 12.63%. A high similarity in municipality prioritization was observed, with a correlation of ρ = 0.9897 according to Spearman's coefficient. Using TOPSIS and SAW, the municipality of Ciénaga ranks first, given that the sub-criteria of population size, area, and 4G coverage hold the highest relevance in the selection process, with percentages of 13.13%, 12.16%, and 11.12%, respectively, while the municipalities of Fundación and Plato alternate between second and third place. On the other hand, La Zona Bananera ranks fourth and fifth. To assess the model's robustness against variability in the criterion weights, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Monte Carlo method with 10,000 iterations. The results indicate that the ranking remains stable, with an average correlation of ρ = 0.9010 between the rankings obtained with SAW and the final ranking using TOPSIS. The influence of high-weight and highly correlated sub-criteria was also assessed. Rankings from AHP-SAW and AHP-TOPSIS were compared with CRITIC-SAW and CRITIC-TOPSIS, yielding correlations of 0.98 and 0.76, respectively. It can be concluded that the deployment of 5G networks can be systematically prioritized based on the mentioned criteria, using a model that remains stable despite changes in criterion weights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.