Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105881›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2025

Serial 12-Lead Electrocardiogram-Based Deep-Learning Model for Hospital Admission Prediction in Emergency Department Cardiac Presentations: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arda Altintepe, Kutsev Bengisu Ozyoruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arda AltintepeHorace Mann School, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-2367-9920
Kutsev Bengisu OzyorukDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Health Sciences Research Building II (HSRB II), 1760 Haygood Dr NE Suite N647, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States, 1 8573125101, 1 4047125005.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-7440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding is often attributed to a slow hospitalization process, leading to reduced quality of care. Predicting early disposition in patients presenting with cardiac issues is challenging: most are ultimately discharged, yet those with a cardiac etiology frequently require hospital admission. Existing scores rely on single-time-point data and often underperform when patient risk evolves during the visit. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a real-time deep-learning model that fuses serial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms with sequential vitals and routinely available clinical data to predict hospital admission early in ED encounters. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV, MIMIC-IV Emergency Department module, and MIMIC-IV electrocardiogram module databases. Adults presenting with chest pain, dyspnea, syncope, or presyncope and at least 1 ECG within their ED stay were included. Two evaluation cohorts were defined: all stays with ≥1 ECG (n=30,421) and a subset with ≥2 ECGs during the encounter (n=11,273). To predict hospital admission, we first established 2 baseline models: a tabular model (random forest [RF]) trained on structured clinical variables, including demographics, triage acuity, past medical history, medications, and laboratory results, and an ECG-only model that learned directly from raw 12-lead waveforms. We then developed a multimodal deep-learning model that combined ECGs with sequential vital signs as well as the same static tabular features. All models were restricted to data available during the stay up to the time of the last ECG. Performance was assessed with stratified 5-fold cross-validation using identical splits across models. Results: The multimodal model achieved an area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.911 when trained on all eligible stays. The model predicted disposition after the final ECG was taken, which was a median of 0.3 (IQR 0.2-5.3) hours after triage and 4.6 (IQR 2.7-7.3) hours before ED departure. Baseline models performed worse: the ECG-only model had an AUROC of 0.852, and the tabular RF had an AUROC of 0.886. In the subset requiring at least 2 ECGs within the stay, ECG-only reached an AUROC of 0.859, and RF, with the longer interval to chart tabular data, reached a higher AUROC of 0.911. The multimodal model had an AUROC of 0.924 and outperformed baselines in each cohort (paired DeLong P<.001). Conclusions: Serial ECGs, when integrated with evolving vitals and routine clinical features, enable accurate, early prediction of ED disposition in patients presenting with cardiac issues. This open-source, reproducible framework highlights the potential of multimodal deep learning to streamline ED flow, prioritize higher risk cases, and detect evolving, time-critical pathology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalHeart DiseasesHospitalizationPatient AdmissionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studiescardiac presentationsdeep learningelectrocardiogramelectrocardiographyemergency departmenthospital admission predictionMIMIC-IVmultimodal machine learningserial ECGtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41105881
PMCPMC12533930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.