ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Acceptability of the RecoverEsupport Digital Health Intervention Among Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RecoverEsupport-A Digital Health Intervention for Recovery After Breast Cancer Surgery: Feasibility and Acceptability Outcomes from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Digital Intervention for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Advanced Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Trial
- Enhancing the User Experience of a Perioperative Digital Health Tool for Information Exchange Using a Human-Centered Design Thinking Approach: Qualitative Observational Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines aim to optimize perioperative care and improve recovery outcomes. The guidelines contain clinician- and patient-led recommendations for pre- and postoperative care, with patient-led recommendations, including smoking cessation, early mobilization, and early resumption of eating and drinking. While adherence to these recommendations can improve recovery outcomes, it is typically low, and many patients require support. Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly accepted as useful tools in delivering individualized health care and have the potential to support adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines. Evidence suggests that intervention use is optimized when DHIs are considered acceptable to end users. RecoverEsupport is a DHI designed to support patient adherence to surgical recovery guidelines, following breast cancer surgery, intended as part of a blended approach with standard care. Objective: The study aimed to explore the surgical experiences and perceived acceptability of the RecoverEsupport DHI among former patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Methods: This qualitative study, underpinned by a constructivist paradigm, explored the recovery experiences and acceptability of RecoverEsupport among women who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer at a tertiary hospital in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. In total, 57 eligible patients were identified from medical records and invited to participate. Among them, 15 consented and were given access to the RecoverEsupport DHI for approximately 2 weeks. Around 11 participants then participated in a semistructured interview exploring their recovery experiences and feedback on the DHI. Interviews were transcribed and double coded prior to analysis using an inductive thematic approach. Results: Participants reported varied experiences of breast cancer surgery and expressed a consistent need for support, with many reporting uncertainty, anxiety, and limited information and physiotherapy support. RecoverEsupport was perceived as acceptable, with strong potential to reduce anxiety, address gaps in care, and provide reassurance. Participants valued the practical content, particularly physiotherapy exercise videos, which reinforced clinician advice and promoted confidence, autonomy, and self-efficacy. The intervention was seen as empowering patients to manage recovery and support their physical and emotional needs. All participants reported that they would recommend RecoverEsupport to others undergoing breast cancer surgery, highlighting its potential as a valuable adjunct to usual care. Conclusions: RecoverEsupport was perceived as a valuable adjunct to standard perioperative care. Four key themes were identified. Participants reported that the program addressed key gaps in information, physiotherapy access, and emotional support, while complementing clinical care. The intervention was seen to empower patients by enhancing knowledge, confidence, and self-efficacy, enabling a more active role in their recovery. It also provided reassurance during a vulnerable period. These findings highlight the potential of DHIs to support patients within constrained health care systems and enhance recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.