Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

RETRACTED: Enhanced heart disease diagnosis and management: A multi-phase framework leveraging deep learning and personalized nutrition.

Ritika Ritika, Rajender Singh Chhillar, Sandeep Dalal, Surjeet Dalal, Iyyappan Moorthi, Mitiku Dubale, Arshad Hashmi

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ritika RitikaDepartment of Computer Science & Applications, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Rajender Singh ChhillarDepartment of Computer Science & Applications, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Sandeep DalalDepartment of Computer Science and Applications, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Surjeet DalalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Iyyappan MoorthiCollege of Information Technology, Ahlia University, Manama, Bahrain.
Mitiku DubaleDepartment of Public Health, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Gambella University, Gambella, Ethiopia.ORCID 0009-0006-1410-8882
Arshad HashmiDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology in Rabigh (FCITR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In health care, an accurate diagnosis with the help of a data-driven forecasting framework takes the risk factors associated with heart disease. However, building such an effective model using deep learning (DL) methods requires high-quality data, i.e., data free of outliers or anomalies. The current paper proposes a new approach to diagnosing and controlling heart diseases by utilizing a multi-tiered data acquisition model, data pre-processing, feature extraction, and DL. The framework encompasses four types of datasets. The first phase of the proposed methodology consists of data acquisition, while the second phase includes advanced data preprocessing for each data type. In phase three, multi-feature extraction methods are used to extract the features from the dataset. In phase four, a combined feature selection technique of ReliefF and Pearson correlation is used to select the best features. Phase five of the study is the formulation of the CILAD-Net DL model that integrates CNN, Inception Net, LSTM, and Angle DetectNet to accurately detect heart disease. The sixth phase implements Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for nutrition recommendations based on the detected disease, thus improving the treatment individualization. The developed model's experimental outcomes are validated with other prevailing models in terms of accuracy, recall, hamming loss, and so on. Finally, the outcomes of the proposed model attain the higher accuracy of 0. 998 for the CILAD-Net model, which is significantly better than DenseNet-201 with 0. 988, ANN with 0. 987, KNN with 0. 977, and CL-Net with 0. 984.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHeart DiseasesPrecision MedicineHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID41105728
PMCPMC12533902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.