Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Development of Ensemble Steric and Electrostatic Chirality (ESEC) descriptors for modelling chromatographic enantioseparations.

Jordy Peeters, Pieter De Gauquier, Fardine Ameli, Yvan Vander Heyden, Debby Mangelings, Kenno Vanommeslaeghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordy PeetersFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1604-4799
Pieter De GauquierFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-8846
Fardine AmeliFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6703-959X
Yvan Vander HeydenFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Debby MangelingsFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Kenno VanommeslaegheFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-5708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, chiral molecular descriptors were defined using 2 distinct approaches: (1) scalar triple products of vectorial molecular properties, and (2) descriptors that attempt to quantify the amount of twist in the overall molecular shape. Because both approaches give rise to conformation dependence, descriptor values were averaged over a conformational ensemble obtained by Molecular Dynamics. In addition, a method is introduced that attempts to quantify the asymmetry of the distribution of the descriptor values over the conformational ensemble. The totality of the resulting descriptors were named "Ensemble Steric and Electrostatic Chirality (ESEC) descriptors". A pilot validation study was performed by building Quantitative Structure-Enantioselectivity Relationships (QSER), i.e. mathematical models to predict the chromatographic separation of enantiomers, using a test set of 43 structurally diverse pharmaceuticals analyzed on a polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase. The best linear regression model (7 descriptors) for the chiral separation (expressed as selectivity factor) featured a low leave-one-out cross validation error (0.0814), a well-predicted elution sequence of the separated enantiomers (21 out of 23 molecules) and a well-predicted αRS for 27 out of 42 molecules. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that acceptable linear QSER models were obtained for chiral chromatographic separations of such a chemically diverse set of pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

Static ElectricityStereoisomerismMolecular ConformationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPharmaceutical PreparationsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID41105691
PMCPMC12533851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.