Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105675›Full record

ReviewCancer research2025

Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.

Kevin R Scibilia, Kit Gallagher, M A Masud, Mark Robertson-Tessi, Chandler D Gatenbee, Jeffrey West, Paul Llamas, Sandhya Prabhakaran, Jill Gallaher, Alexander R A Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin R ScibiliaDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-943X
Kit GallagherDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-1401-115X
M A MasudDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-7424
Mark Robertson-TessiDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-0143-9587
Chandler D GatenbeeDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-9730-5964
Jeffrey WestDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-4664
Paul LlamasDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0009-0005-5137-8497
Sandhya PrabhakaranDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-507X
Jill GallaherDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-6676
Alexander R A AndersonDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-4383

Funding

The Delta Ecology of NSCLC TreatmentU54CA274507 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Alexander Robertson Allan Anderson, ROBERT A GATENBY · 2023 to 2026
$9.4M
EPSRC CDT in Sustainable Approaches to Biomedical Science: Responsible and Reproducible Research SABS:R3 (EP/S024093/1)Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) Center of Excellence for Evolutionary TherapyNational Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA274507NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models have played a significant role in the development of current chemo- and radiotherapy treatment protocols. The widespread use of cytotoxic drugs has shaped the paradigm of uniformly administering a "maximum tolerated dose" to patients; however, this approach fails to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of challenging cancers, including metastatic disease. Recent clinical trials and regulatory decisions have aimed to address these issues by integrating mathematical models to drive preclinical experiments and personalize treatment schedules. By capturing mechanisms of dose-response dynamics, ecological dynamics such as tumor-immune interactions or competition dynamics, and evolutionary dynamics across different therapeutic regimens, mathematical models hold the potential to advance current therapeutic strategies. As more preclinical and clinical data become available, the integration of mathematical models with "virtual patient" frameworks, including "digital twins," and artificial intelligence methods could further advance the mechanistic complexity and decision support capabilities of such models. Nonetheless, translating mechanistic models to routine clinical workflows will require overcoming current translational barriers, notably access to clinical data in standardized formats and regulatory constraints. Overall, recent trials demonstrate the promise of the field of mathematical oncology in translating predictive dynamics into treatment decision-making beyond the "maximum tolerated dose" approach. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingMedical OncologyModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsHumansPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41105675
PMCPMC12614879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.