ReviewCancer research2025
Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.
Review in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Antifragile Therapy Is a Treatment Strategy to Suppress Drug Resistance by Exploiting Dose-Response Convexity.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Advancing AI for multi-omics and clinical data integration in basic and translational cancer research.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Cancer Heterogeneity and Cancer Cell Plasticity: Molecular Mechanisms and Precision Therapy.MedComm · 2026Review
- Three-Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) debate: Medical physics should focus less on geometric precision and more on biological outcomes.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- 75 Years of Mathematical Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A paradigm shift toward full-cycle management of atrial fibrillation: integrating digital twins and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical models have played a significant role in the development of current chemo- and radiotherapy treatment protocols. The widespread use of cytotoxic drugs has shaped the paradigm of uniformly administering a "maximum tolerated dose" to patients; however, this approach fails to account for the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of challenging cancers, including metastatic disease. Recent clinical trials and regulatory decisions have aimed to address these issues by integrating mathematical models to drive preclinical experiments and personalize treatment schedules. By capturing mechanisms of dose-response dynamics, ecological dynamics such as tumor-immune interactions or competition dynamics, and evolutionary dynamics across different therapeutic regimens, mathematical models hold the potential to advance current therapeutic strategies. As more preclinical and clinical data become available, the integration of mathematical models with "virtual patient" frameworks, including "digital twins," and artificial intelligence methods could further advance the mechanistic complexity and decision support capabilities of such models. Nonetheless, translating mechanistic models to routine clinical workflows will require overcoming current translational barriers, notably access to clinical data in standardized formats and regulatory constraints. Overall, recent trials demonstrate the promise of the field of mathematical oncology in translating predictive dynamics into treatment decision-making beyond the "maximum tolerated dose" approach. This article is part of a special series: Driving Cancer Discoveries with Computational Research, Data Science, and Machine Learning/AI .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.