ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Hybrid models combining trend and seasonality components with machine learning algorithms provide accurate forecasting of malaria incidence.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in machine learning and Bayesian modeling for tropical disease prediction, diagnosis, and risk analysis: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal ensemble machine learning forecasts of animal leptospirosis in enzootic Indian States using integrated environmental predictors.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forecasting malaria incidence is vital for effective resource allocation during malaria elimination. In this study, we highlight robust models for forecasting incidence using climatic and malaria data from Goa, India. Multi-collinearity and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to identify most important predictors of malaria transmission among 15 climatic variables. Three machine-learning models (Support vector machines, Random Forest, Extreme gradient boosting), three time-series models (ARIMA, SARIMA, SARIMAX), and three hybrid models (RF-ARMA, SVM-ARMA, XGB-ARMA) were then trained and tested on data spanning from 2010 to 2019. Climatic extremes have stronger influence on malaria transmission than average values in Goa. Machine learning models exhibit lower accuracy (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE):13-37) but high precision (lower confidence intervals). Conversely, time series models, yielded more accurate results (RMSE: 5-41) albeit with less precision (wider confidence interval). To address this, we augmented machine learning models by incorporating time series variables which significantly bolstered their accuracy while retaining their inherent precision (RMSE: 0·5-15). Integrating time-series components into machine learning models harnesses the strengths of both approaches resulting in a substantial enhancement in accuracy and precision of forecasts. This technique has potential for wider use in planning malaria elimination, and routine epidemiological data analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.