Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105657›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

On the road to vision zero: How unit-dose dispensing systems and health-IT are transforming clinical practices.

Saskia Herrmann, Natalie Bräuer, Tobias Zimmermann, Thomas Steiner, Dominic Fenske, Jana Gerstmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saskia HerrmannClinical Pharmacy, Helios Kliniken GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Natalie BräuerClinical Pharmacy, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany.
Tobias ZimmermannClinical Pharmacy, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany.
Thomas SteinerDepartment of Urology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany.
Dominic FenskeClinical Pharmacy, Helios Kliniken GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Jana GerstmeierClinical Pharmacy, Helios Kliniken GmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0061-2683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study investigates real-world prescribing patterns and validation workflows linked to the implementation of a Unit-Dose Dispensing System (UDDS) within a digital medication management framework. The overall goal is to enhance medication safety, minimize errors, and improve clinical efficiency and workflow processes. Retrospective analysis of prescription data from the Electronic Medication System (EMS) in 2023 at a large tertiary care teaching hospital focused on physicians` prescribing patterns, drug compatibility with UDDS, and challenges faced by pharmacists during validation. Interactive dashboards provided real-time insights into prescription types, volumes, timing, and pharmacist validation rates. Of the 4.7 million doses prescribed in 2023, 64% were UDDS-compatible, highlighting its strong potential to streamline workflows and reduce nursing workload on the wards. Dashboard analysis revealed a clear alignment between peak prescribing times and UDDS production schedules, indicating effective synchronization between clinical and logistical workflows. Notably, an average of 631.6 blister-packable doses per day remained unvalidated by clinical pharmacists due to contraindications, dosage discrepancies, or duplicate prescriptions, emphasizing the need for enhanced health-IT support to address these gaps. UDDS combined with interactive dashboards enables targeted filtering and rapid identification of trends and gaps in pharmacotherapy. Integrating UDDS into a digital medication management framework offers significant potential to improve patient safety and operational efficiency. Key challenges in implementing UDDS into routine clinical practice were identified. Adhering to prescription submission cut-off times is essential to ensure UDDS effectiveness. Tailoring UDDS workflows and interactive dashboards to department-specific needs can further improve medication safety, strengthen pharmacists' oversight, and support the long-term sustainability of safe and efficient medication practices.

Identifiers

PMID41105657
PMCPMC12533864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.