ArticlePloS one2025
Treatment outcomes in lower limb lymphedema misdiagnosed as iliac vein compression syndrome: A retrospective analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iliac vein compression is highly prevalent in the general population, which may lead to misdiagnosis of lower limb lymphedema as iliac vein compression syndrome and subsequent stent placement. This study retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcomes of 11 patients with secondary lymphedema who had previously been diagnosed with iliac vein compression by venography and underwent iliac vein stenting. Following iliac vein stent placement, six patients with Stage I and IIa lymphedema experienced partial relief of limb swelling; however, symptoms recurred and worsened within three months. The remaining patients showed no improvement in swelling after the stent was placed. Due to inadequate symptom relief following stent implantation, these patients underwent reevaluation and were subsequently diagnosed with lymphedema. Based on disease staging, they received appropriate interventions including complex decongestive therapy, lymphovenous anastomosis, or a combination of liposuction and lymphovenous anastomosis. Four patients with Stage I and IIa lymphedema underwent complex decongestive therapy, four patients with Stage I and IIa lymphedema received lymphovenous anastomosis, and the remaining three patients with Stage IIb lymphedema underwent liposuction combined with secondary lymphovenous anastomosis. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment to evaluate limb morphology and functional outcomes using the Disability and Health Questionnaire for Lower Limb Lymphedema scores. Therapeutic outcomes analysis revealed that complex decongestive therapy, lymphovenous anastomosis, and liposuction demonstrated favorable efficacy in managing lymphedema cases with suboptimal response to prior iliac vein stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.