Observational studyPloS one2025
Effects of different physical therapy training protocols on patients with idiopathic scoliosis: Short-term results.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of Digital Health Technologies in Scoliosis Rehabilitation: Systematic Review Based on the Technology Classification Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive narrative review of scoliosis in children and adolescents: epidemiology, screening strategies, therapeutic interventions, and biomechanical research.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- In the light of isokinetic test and sEMG: how effective is core stabilization based exercise training in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- The Evidence of Physiotherapy Scoliosis-Specific Exercises in Treating Secondary Postural Deviations in Mild and Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Preoperative Neurological and Neurophysiological Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated or Not Treated with Physiotherapy: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of Physiotherapy Based on the Rigo Concept and Whole-Body Vibration on Sagittal Spinal Curvatures, Trunk Symmetry, and the Angle of Trunk Rotation in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiological investigation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluation of the therapeutic effect of an integrated sports and medicine rehabilitation strategy for scoliosis treatment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic scoliosis (IS), a three-dimensional spinal deformity common in adolescents, can be treated with numerous approaches, including Schroth, Spiral stabilization (SPS), and core exercises, to improve spinal alignment and health. However, few studies have shown the superiority of one treatment over another.
objectiveThis retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three distinct physical therapy protocols in managing IS among adolescents aged 6-18 years with Cobb angles ≤40°.
methodsA total of 61 patients were allocated to one of three therapeutic groups. Each group received interventions twice weekly for 10 sessions. Primary outcomes were assessed by measuring changes in the Cobb angle, whereas secondary outcomes included evaluations of pain (visual analog scale, VAS), the angle of trunk rotation (ATR), trunk aesthetic clinical evaluation (TRACE), radiographic parameters (Alignment of the C7 plumbline (C7PL), clavicle angle, and pelvic obliquity), and quality of life (the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire,SRS-22).
resultsThe findings revealed significant within-group improvements in the Cobb angle, pain, and trunk rotation for all interventions (p < 0.05). Notably, between-group comparisons indicated that both the Schroth and SPS modalities resulted in greater reductions in the Cobb angle and trunk rotation than core stabilization exercises did (p < 0.05). Moreover, SPS resulted in superior enhancements in the clavicle angle and dynamic postural control, whereas Schroth yielded significant improvements in C7PL alignment.
conclusionThis short-term study underscores the relative effectiveness of the Schroth and SPS interventions in managing three-dimensional spinal deformities and enhancing dynamic postural control while recognizing the limitations of core stabilization exercises for scoliosis. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis retrospective analysis of a clinical trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500096077) https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ChiCTR2500096077.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.