Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding social support during pregnancy: A qualitative study of women's lived experiences in Nepal.

Lalita Kumari Sah, Eleni Hatzidimitriadou, Rajeeb Kumar Sah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lalita Kumari SahFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-3970
Eleni HatzidimitriadouFaculty of Medicine, Health and Social Care, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1174-7145
Rajeeb Kumar SahHuman and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research study examines the experience and understanding of available social support in Nepal and its importance during pregnancy. The interviews, utilising twenty in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Nepal, were analysed inductively using a thematic analysis approach. The findings suggested that women consider their husband's support the most important and desired support during pregnancy, while women also acknowledged support from relatives and neighbours. None of the women experienced any organised community support or NGO/INGO support, and the support from healthcare providers was limited. At the policy level, the maternity leave policy by the government of Nepal is seen as inadequate support in promoting working women in Nepal, and it lacks implementation in informal work sectors. The study concludes that appropriate social support can significantly enhance the well-being of pregnant women. Given the limited availability of formal support systems and the central role of spousal and informal community support, these findings highlight the need for context-specific interventions. Therefore, we recommend conducting interventional studies to design and evaluate targeted support mechanisms that address the diverse needs of pregnant women in Nepal, shaped by their socioeconomic and cultural contexts.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansNepalPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41105644
PMCPMC12533895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.