ArticlePloS one2025
Personal and perceived stigma towards mental disorders among attendants of patients with mental illness in selected health facilities of Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the stigma among attendants (close relatives or other caregivers) who brought patients with mental illness to the selected mental health facilities in Bangladesh. This mixed-method study was part of a nationwide survey where respondents were conveniently selected. Cross-sectional data were collected from 176 attendants of patients with mental illness, and qualitative data were collected from 40 respondents. Quantitative data were collected in hand-held tablets using the Day's Mental Illness Stigma Scale questionnaire. Qualitative data was collected in recorders, using a semi-structured guideline. The attendants had more stigma around the patients' ability to maintain relationships, hygiene and discretion regarding their illness, with the highest level of stigma towards hygiene issues (score: 5.4). There was more positive attitude towards the treatability, curability, and recovery of the patients due to faith in the professional expertise of the service providers at mental health facilities, with the least level of stigma towards professional expertise (score: 6.4). Older people, females, and educated attendants were generally less stigmatized towards patients with mental illness than their counterparts. This study found that more stigma was present around the domains' relationships, hygiene, anxiety, and visibility, while less stigma was present around the domains' treatability, curability, and recovery of the patients. Further studies can be conducted to understand the effect of various factors on stigma, to aid in the development of interventions and counselling frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.