Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The recurrence and mortality risk in Luminal A breast cancer patients who lived in high pollution area.

Pimwarat Srikummoon, Patrinee Traisathit, Wimrak Onchan, Chagkrit Ditsatham, Natthapat Thongsak, Nawapon Nakharutai, Salinee Thumronglaohapun, Titaporn Supasri, Phonpat Hemwan, Imjai Chitapanarux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pimwarat SrikummoonDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-3131
Patrinee TraisathitDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-1928
Wimrak OnchanDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5174-4403
Chagkrit DitsathamHead Neck and Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9278-4097
Natthapat ThongsakDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8815-5191
Nawapon NakharutaiDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Salinee ThumronglaohapunDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-6171
Titaporn SupasriAtmospheric Research Unit of National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Phonpat HemwanDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Imjai ChitapanaruxDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-0149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luminal A is the most common subtype of breast cancer and has the best prognosis comparing to the others. The association between air pollution and survival of breast cancer have been reported but not specific to this subtype. We examined pollutant distributions over a decade in upper Northern Thailand, the area of high average annual particulate matter levels, and their impact on the mortality and recurrence risks of patients with luminal A breast cancer. Retrospective data of 1,305 luminal A breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2003 to 2018 were enrolled to this study. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with mortality and recurrence risks including all known risk factors and the annually averaged concentrations of pollutants. On multivariable analysis; metastatic stage (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) =10.50; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 7.23-15.25), smoking history (aHR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.14-2.60), and age ≥ 50 years old (aHR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.13-1.90) were significant factors influencing mortality risk. Factors contributing to recurrence risk included metastatic stage (aHR) 4.96 (95% CI: 2.78-8.83) and exposure to the time-updated local concentration of PM10 > 55 µg/m3 (aHR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.16-2.45). Exposure to air pollutants is one of the detrimental factors affected to recurrence and mortality in luminal A subtype breast cancer.

Indexed as

Air PollutionBreast NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAir PollutantsEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMiddle AgedParticulate MatterPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThailandAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID41105628
PMCPMC12533841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.