Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105596›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025

Wastewater-based reproduction rates for epidemic curve reconstruction.

Emily Somerset, Justin J Slater, Patrick E Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily SomersetDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1Z5, Canada.
Justin J SlaterDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Patrick E BrownDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1Z5, Canada.

Funding

Institute for PandemicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto's Emerging and Pandemic Infections Consortium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a hierarchical Bayesian framework for reconstructing epidemic curves using under-reported case counts and wastewater data. Our approach models wastewater signals as differentiable Gaussian processes, enabling inference on their relative growth rates, which are used to define a wastewater-based reproduction rate. These estimates are incorporated into a binomially thinned Poisson autoregressive model for case counts using a modular inference strategy. We apply this framework to reconstruct the Covid-19 epidemic curve in Toronto, validating our model through out-of-sample forecasts and comparisons with independent serosurvey-based cumulative incidence estimates. We also apply the framework to New Zealand's Covid-19 data to reconstruct its epidemic curve and demonstrate improvements over an existing joint model for wastewater and case data. A key advantage of our framework, highlighted in this comparison, is that it does not rely on pre-specified constant parameters, allowing the model to better adapt to evolving pandemic conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Models, StatisticalWastewaterBayes TheoremHumansNew ZealandOntarioSARS-CoV-2WastewaterBayesian hierarchical modelGaussian processesinfectious disease modelingmodular Bayesian inferencewastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID41105596
PMCPMC12533577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.