ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025
Dementia care shifted towards outpatient services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems worldwide, forcing adaptations in care pathways. A particularly vulnerable patient group are those with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia who experienced unique challenges during this period.ObjectiveThis study aims to examine shifts in healthcare utilization, focusing on inpatient and outpatient services.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 27,240 dementia cases from 86 German hospitals, comparing inpatient and outpatient care between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022 to cases from 2019. Admission rates, length of stay, disease severity (case mix, comorbidities) and complications (i.e., intensive care admission, mortality) were assessed using (generalized) mixed models.ResultsOutpatient care utilization for dementia increased during the pandemic (+33%, from 11.3 before to 15.1 daily admissions during the pandemic, p < 0.001), with three outpatient admissions accompanying each lacking inpatient admission (-20%, from 6.3 before to 5.0 daily admissions during the pandemic, p < 0.001). Morbidity indicators were generally lower during the pandemic for inpatient cases, while the proportion of comorbid depression was higher.ConclusionsThe pandemic triggered a substantial redistribution of dementia care favoring outpatient over inpatients services. The shift reflects an increased need for dementia-related medical interventions during the pandemic. This was likely due to social isolation aggravating dementia symptoms as evidenced by the increased rate of depression. At the same time, fear of COVID-19 exposure in hospitals likely discouraged inpatient admissions. We conclude that flexible and integrated care pathways are essential to ensure continuity and quality of care for dementia patients, especially during public health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.