Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105575›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Super Users' Reported Best Practices for Coordinating Proactive Integrated Use of Virtual Health Care Resources: Prospective Concurrent Mixed Methods Human-Centered Design Study.

Jolie N Haun, Rachel C Benzinger, Julie McMahon-Grenz, Lisa M Ballistrea, S Angel Klanchar, Rebecca S Bolinski, Justin T McDaniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jolie N HaunResearch and Development Service, James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-3763
Rachel C BenzingerResearch and Development Service, James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-7929
Julie McMahon-GrenzResearch and Development Service, James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-0091
Lisa M BallistreaResearch and Development Service, James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-3945
S Angel KlancharResearch and Development Service, James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-4235
Rebecca S BolinskiDepartment of Population Science and Policy, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-3109
Justin T McDanielSchool of Human Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-1645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProactive integrated virtual health care resource (VHR) use is the self-initiated, coordinated use of applicable virtual systems as a team or an individual for coordinating timely delivery of high-quality health care. Based on literature and the purpose of this project, super users are defined as clinical team members identified by colleagues as proactive users of VHRs (ie, early adopters) who coordinate care delivery and champion resource use. Super users' proactive integrated VHR use improves workflow and workload efficiency and supports provider uptake and promotion, which increases patient adoption and sustained use to improve care outcomes. Previous studies have not examined super users' integrated use of available VHRs across the health care continuum or within service-specific clinical workflows.

objectiveThe objective of this project was to describe VHR super users' activities and outcomes to document their practices and inform identification and dissemination of current and best practices.

methodsA prospective, concurrent, mixed methods design using qualitative interviewing and human-centered design was applied. Purposive sampling was used to recruit and conduct interviews with super users across 5 specialty services (ie, cardiology, whole health, spinal cord injury, education, and rehabilitation) at a large Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in the Southeastern United States. Tailored scripts and surveys were used to conduct data collection. Rapid iterative content analysis and data triangulation were used to inform data distillation.

resultsSuper user (N=15) data, from specialty services (n=5) revealed 57 best practices (48 data-derived and 9 established) using 60 VHRs within 11 major categories of tasks (eg, appointment management, patient care delivery, medication management), with 43 subcategories (eg, scheduling, appointment reminder, preappointment huddles). Computerized patient record system and joint legacy viewer, Secure Messaging, telephone, Department of Veterans Affairs Video Connect, and Microsoft Teams were reported as 5 most commonly used VHRs. Across the care continuum, best practices around patient-generated health data (n=15), and appointment management and patient and staff technology resource access (n=13) were most commonly reported.

conclusionsResults identify super users' practices through case scenarios that illustrate the integration of VHRs within and across service-specific clinical workflows. This project informs "best practices" through integrated use of VHRs across the care continuum. While the findings were specific to 5 specialty services, practices can be applied across services throughout workflows. Recommendations were also made for consideration for deimplementation of select practices. Findings can be used for training, education, and establishing best practices and deimplementation of practices. Future research should aim to evaluate outcomes associated with the use of best practices. These data-driven products lay foundational work in identifying and disseminating best practices in VHR use to inform the transformation of the Veterans Health Administration's learning health care system into a culture of VHR super users.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansProspective StudieseHealthmedical care teamsquality improvementremote careremote deliverytelehealthveteranvirtual carevirtual healthcare resourcesvirtual medical modality

Identifiers

PMID41105575
PMCPMC12663705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.