ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Optimizing antimicrobial susceptibility testing: cost and environmental benefits of MIC volume reduction.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Westersidones A-C: Antimicrobial Depsidones From the Deep-Sea Cold Seep-Derived Endozoic Fungus Westerdykella dispersa CS-734.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) is essential for evaluating antimicrobial efficacy, guiding both clinical treatment decisions and drug development. The standard broth microdilution method is widely used but requires significant reagent volumes, which can be limiting when working with novel or expensive antimicrobials. This study assesses the feasibility of reducing assay volumes without compromising MIC accuracy. We compared the MIC values obtained in standard 96-well plates (100 and 200 µL) to those in 384-well plates with reduced volumes (30 and 50 µL) for a range of ATCC gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, as well as yeast species. Our results demonstrate that, except for micafungin against yeast, MIC values obtained with reduced volumes remained within the acceptable variability ranges defined by EUCAST and CLSI. The consistency of the MIC evaluation in 30 µL final volume was then confirmed against a selection of gram-negative 30 clinical isolates. Evaporation, a potential source of bias in smaller volumes, was mitigated by conducting experiments in a water-saturated atmosphere. Furthermore, reduced assay volumes significantly lowered material costs and antimicrobial consumption. This miniaturization approach provides a cost-effective and high-throughput alternative for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility and is particularly advantageous in research settings where compound availability is limited or associated with high costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.