ArticleMilitary medicine2026
A Ramp Protocol with Increasing Incline and Additional Weight for Special Operation Forces Provides a Valid Assessment of V.O2max.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurately measuring aerobic endurance in military and police Special Operations Forces (SOF) and in load-bearing sports requires a cardiopulmonary exercise test protocol that incorporates load and terrain demands. We developed a ramped treadmill test incorporating a 12.6 kg vest and incremental incline and evaluated its validity against a standard speed-ramped protocol. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-three healthy and trained volunteers completed both protocols in randomized order. Breath-by-breath V˙O2 and heart rate data at the ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2, as well as V˙O2max were compared using Bland-Altman plots, two one-sided tests (TOST), as well as Bayesian range of practical equivalence (ROPE) using ±2.84 ml/kg/min (V˙O2) and ±3.1% (HR) pre-defined boundaries for insignificant difference.
resultsMean test duration was 710 ± 85 sec with both protocols. V˙O2max differed by -0.2 ml/kg/min (95% CI -1.3 to 0.9). TOST did not confirm strict equivalence, but Bayesian ROPE placed 100% of the posterior within ± 2.84 ml/kg/min. Submaximal V˙O2@VT2 and HR thresholds met 95% ROPE criteria; V˙O2@VT1 narrowly missed.
conclusionsA vest-loaded, incline-ramped CPET designed for SOF tasks and sports disciplines that involve carrying additional load produces practically equivalent values of V˙O2max compared to a traditional speed-ramped protocol. The new protocol allows for accurate V˙O2 and heart rate measures for SOF and athletes carrying weight on steep terrain, while also providing a task-specific experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.