ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Cannabis Laws and Opioid Use Among Commercially Insured Patients With Cancer Diagnoses.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Pain is a prevalent cancer-related symptom, but limited research investigates whether cannabis is an effective analgesic for cancer pain. Objective: To examine the association of medical and recreational cannabis dispensary availability on prescription opioid dispensing among commercially insured patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used synthetic control to investigate the association of cannabis dispensary openings with pain medication dispensing among patients with cancer. Data were extracted from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020. The study population included patients aged 18 to 64 years with a cancer diagnosis and at least 6 months of continuous enrollment. Associations were estimated by age, race and ethnicity, and sex. Data were analyzed between December 2024 and February 2025. Exposures: Exposures included indicators for whether a medical or recreational cannabis dispensary was open in each state-quarter. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome measures for opioids prescriptions were (1) the rate of patients with a prescription per 10 000 patients, (2) the quarterly mean days' supply per prescription, and (3) the quarterly mean number of prescriptions per patient. Results: The study included a mean (SD) of 3.05 (0.86) million patients annually across the US (mean [SD] age, 43.7 [9.6] years; mean [SD] 59.0% [0.32%] female). Medical cannabis dispensary openings were associated with significant reductions in all opioid outcomes. The rate of patients with cancer with opioid prescriptions changed by -41.07 per 10 000 (95% CI, -54.78 to -27.36 per 10 000; P < .001), the quarterly mean days' supply by -2.54 days (95% CI, -3.16 to -1.92 days; P < .001), and the mean number of prescriptions per patient by -0.099 (95% CI, -0.121 to -0.077; P < .001). Recreational dispensary openings were also associated with reductions in opioid outcomes, though estimated treatment effects were smaller. The rate of prescriptions changed by -20.63 per 10 000 (95% CI, -35.35 to -5.91 per 10 000; P = .049), the mean daily supply by -1.09 days supplied per prescription (95% CI, -1.72 to -0.46 days; P = .04), and the mean number of prescriptions per patient by -0.097 (95% CI, -0.134 to -0.060; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings indicate cannabis may be a substitute for opioids in the management of cancer-related pain. However, further research directly observing cannabis use is needed to evaluate the efficacy of cannabis as a treatment for cancer-related pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.