ArticleJAMA health forum2025
A Global Analysis of Within-Country Health Inequalities.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional associations between loneliness and physical multimorbidity and the mediating role of social inactivity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Global co-occurrence patterns of cancer and cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Pro-Rich Inequality in Health-Related Quality of Life Among Primary Care Diabetes Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Health inequalities are a defining social and policy concern. However, understanding whether a specific country's inequalities are large or small is limited without a comparative perspective with other countries. Objective: To systematically compare health inequalities in 181 countries and territories from 1960 to 2021 by developing a Health Inequality Normalized Index (HINI) that does not rely on secondary variables such as income, education, or race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study including demographic cross-national comparative analysis used age-at-death distributions from life tables for 181 countries and territories from 1960 to 2021. All county and territory health inequalities were ranked, and a random forest analysis was conducted of 191 factors to identify their relative role. Special attention was given to trends in health inequalities in the US. Data were analyzed between October 2023 and January 2025. Exposures: HINI was constructed by placing observed age-at-death distributions between perfect equality (conceptualized as everyone living exactly to the most common age at death) and the worst possible state of inequality (the largest variance in age-at-death distribution observed for each country). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the HINI, which measures within-country inequality in age-at-death distribution consistently for all countries and territories. Additional analyses explored the importance of potential factors (eg, infant mortality, wealth inequality, governance quality) associated with health inequalities. Results: Of 181 countries and territories between 1960 and 2021, in 2019 (pre-COVID-19), Turkmenistan had the highest HINI (most unequal), while Hong Kong had the lowest (most equal). Random forest analysis revealed that infant mortality and life expectancy were the primary factors associated with cross-country variation in HINI. Globally, health inequality decreased from 1960 to 2021, consistent with improvements in infant mortality and life expectancy. However, inequality trends diverged by country income group, improving more rapidly in high-income than in low-income countries. In the US, health inequality decreased but less than in other high-income nations: it ranked 19th in 1960 but 77th in 2021 among 181 countries and territories, and 55th among 59 high-income countries. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that infant mortality and life expectancy are critical factors in shaping countries' health inequalities. Sustained improvements in countries with high infant mortality may have the potential to further reduce inequality at a global scale. In the US, comparatively slow progress on health inequality underscores its salience in national health policy discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.