Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105379›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Healthcare Resource Utilisation and Costs in Patients with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Retrospective Analysis of German Insurance Claims Data.

Paul Dolin, Anat Shavit, Jennifer Rowell, Chris Edmonds, Josefine Persson, Danuta Kielar, Keltie McDonald, Antje Mevius, Bernhard Hellmich, Stephanie Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul DolinBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Anat ShavitBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9898-907X
Jennifer RowellMarket Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2187-5315
Chris EdmondsMarket Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Josefine PerssonMarket Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-3523
Danuta KielarBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1814-1100
Keltie McDonald, Cytel, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-9049
Antje MeviusInstitut für Pharmakoökonomie und Arzneimittellogistik (IPAM) e.V., Alter Holzhafen, Wismar, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6693
Bernhard HellmichKlinik für Innere Medizin, Rheumatologie, Pneumologie, Nephrologie und Diabetologie, Medius Kliniken, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Tübingen, Kirchheim unter Teck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8014-1801
Stephanie Y ChenBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. stephanie.chen@astrazeneca.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence is limited on the clinical and economic burden of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in Europe. We evaluated EGPA healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), days off work, and costs in Germany.

methodsThis analysis used claims data from the German statutory health insurance fund AOK Plus. Patients with newly diagnosed EGPA (index date 2016-2020; ≥ 12 months pre-diagnosis health plan enrolment) were matched (1:4) with general insured individuals without EGPA. Baseline was 12 months pre-diagnosis; follow-up was until 31 December 2020, insurance disenrollment, or death. Outcomes included HCRU and related costs and days off work.

resultsThe study included 155 patients and 620 matched individuals. In the EGPA cohort, all-cause HCRU was higher post-diagnosis than during baseline in all categories. Mean annualised in-patient hospitalisations/patient and pharmacy claims/patient for any EGPA therapy were 2.99 and 5.87, respectively, during 1-year post-diagnosis versus 1.15 and 1.80, respectively, during baseline. Mean total annualised cost of all-cause HCRU/patient with EGPA was €19,700 during 1-year post-diagnosis versus €6,678 during baseline, with in-patient hospitalisations and pharmacy costs the main cost drivers of EGPA care. Over 5 years post-diagnosis, mean annualised HCRU rate per patient was significantly higher for the EGPA versus the matched cohort for all evaluated aspects of HCRU (p < 0.001). The mean total annualised all-cause HCRU cost was sevenfold higher (EGPA €14,771/patient vs matched cohort €2,094/patient; p < 0.001). In-patient hospitalisation (€8,276/patient) was the single largest driver of all-cause costs over 5 years post-diagnosis. Mean total days off work and associated annualised costs of productivity loss were also significantly higher over 5 years post-diagnosis in the EGPA versus the matched cohort (30.74 vs 13.35 days/year; €3,632 vs €1,555 annually/patient, both p < 0.001).

conclusionsThese real-world data highlight the substantial economic burden associated with EGPA, characterised by increased HCRU, costs and productivity losses, underscoring the need for effective management strategies.

Indexed as

AOK plusEconomic burdenEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitisHCRUHealthcare costsProductivity lossReal-world evidenceRetrospective

Identifiers

PMID41105379
PMCPMC12638612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.