ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Reproducibility assessment of biventricular strain derived from Long-Axis feature tracking in travelling Volunteers - A study in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR).
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the reproducibility of biventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessment using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a multicenter study of travelling volunteers.
methodsTwenty travelling volunteers were prospectively scanned at four sites with same-vendor scanners at 3.0T (sites I, II, III) and 1.5T (site IV). Cine imaging in three long-axis views was performed using a segmented balanced steady-state free precession sequence with 30 cardiac phases except site II with 25 phases.
resultsImaging and post-processing were carried out successfully for 18 volunteers in a core lab setting. Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences in left ventricular (LV) GLS between sites I and II (p < 0.001) and sites II and IV (p = 0.013), as well as in right ventricular (RV) GLS between sites I and IV (p = 0.027). RV GLS values were significantly higher at 3.0T (p = 0.024), whereas field strength had no significant impact on LV GLS (p = 0.153). Conversely, the use of 25 cardiac phases at site II was associated with significantly lower LV GLS values (p < 0.001), while RV GLS remained unaffected (p = 0.825).
conclusionWhen applying feature tracking-based strain in a multicenter study, careful consideration should be given to the temporal resolution for LV longitudinal strain and to magnetic field strength for RV longitudinal strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.