ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Perceptions of neuromuscular electrostimulation of patients with Parkinson's disease and their caregivers: the impact on swallowing and speech from a qualitative perspective.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on neurological function, balance, and quality of life in patients with parkinson's disease.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeParkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that manifests itself through motor and non-motor symptoms, which significantly influence quality of life. We aimed to explore the experiences of patients with PD and their caregivers before, during and after receiving treatment with neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES), and to analyse how they perceive the changes experienced, especially in relation to swallowing and speech. METHODOLOGY: A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted through 11 focus groups (FGs): 7 with patients and 4 with caregivers, held separately. Group sizes ranged from two to six participants. The decision to include small groups, including those with only two participants, was made to achieve theoretical saturation of the data. A manual inductive thematic analysis of discourse was performed, coding responses into emergent categories.
resultsThe study sample consisted of 38 participants: 24 patients and 14 caregivers. The results fell into two broad categories: patient experience and carer experience. In terms of patients’ experiences, the majority reported significant improvements in swallowing, salivation and, to a lesser extent, speech. Regarding caregivers, the improvements observed in patients were perceived as a relief in their daily caregiving responsibilities, facilitating meal preparation, enhancing communication, and providing greater reassurance in supporting the treatment process.
conclusionThis qualitative study provides valuable insights into NMES treatment in PD, showing improvements in areas such as swallowing, speech and saliva. By including the experiences of patients and carers, we identify critical aspects that impact on daily life that cannot be fully explored by other methods. The findings highlight the importance of a more holistic and individualised approach to treatment. It is suggested that future qualitative research should continue to explore these experiences with a view to improving rehabilitation strategies and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.