Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105234›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Reducing contrast media dosage for pulmonary embolism CTPA in PCD-CT: a comparative study of EID-CT and PCD-CT in the era of individualized protocolling.

Lion Stammen, Eva J I Hoeijmakers, Thomas G Flohr, Hester A Gietema, Janneke Vandewall, Joachim E Wildberger, Cécile R L P N Jeukens, Bibi Martens

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lion Stammen *Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. lion.stammen@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8031-8223
Eva J I Hoeijmakers *Department of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thomas G FlohrDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hester A GietemaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janneke VandewallDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joachim E WildbergerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cécile R L P N JeukensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bibi MartensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate diagnostic image quality (IQ) for pulmonary embolism detection in photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) with significantly reduced contrast media (CM) dose vs conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), using optimized and individualized CM protocols. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans performed on the EID-CT (Jan 2024-Mar 2024) with an individualized kilovoltage (kV) and total body weight (TBW) adapted CM protocol, and on the PCD-CT (Aug 2023-Feb 2024) with a TBW adapted CM protocol matching the 70 kV EID-CT protocol, were retrospectively collected. EID-CT scans were performed at 70-120 kV, based on patients' size, while PCD-CT scans were performed at 120 kV with 55 keV virtual monoenergetic images. Objective IQ assessment included mean attenuation (in Hounsfield Units), signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two board-certified radiologists assessed diagnostic IQ subjectively using a five-point Likert scale.

resultsIn 140 EID-CT and 118 PCD-CT scans, PCD-CT reduced total iodine load by 26.7% and CT dose index volume by 24.4%. Objective IQ parameters showed no significant differences, except for a decrease in CNR in the proximal pulmonary arteries in PCD-CT scans (p = 0.02). Subjective IQ was rated as moderate/good by observers 1 and 2 in 94.9% and 97.9% of the EID-CT scans, respectively, and 96.5% and 100% of the PCD-CT scans, respectively.

conclusionPCD-CT with a TBW-adapted CM protocol can achieve substantial reductions in both CM and radiation dose compared to EID-CT with individualized kV and TBW adapted CM protocols, while maintaining diagnostic IQ in CTPA scans. KEY POINTS: Question The feasibility of CM reduction in PCD-CT vs EID-CT with highly individualized CM protocols, while maintaining diagnostic IQ. Findings PCD-CT reduces total iodine load by 26.7% and CT dose index volume by 24.4% compared to EID-CT, with comparable objective and subjective diagnostic IQ. Clinical relevance This approach enables CM reduction, potentially lowering patient risk and providing environmental and financial benefits. Additionally, PCD-CT allows for CM and radiation dose reduction while maintaining comparable IQ.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaPulmonary EmbolismTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaComputed tomographyContrast mediaDiagnostic imagingPhoton-counting detectorPulmonary artery

Identifiers

PMID41105234
PMCPMC13035631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.