SynthesisNeuro-oncology2026
T cell immunity in glioma and potential implications for immunotherapy: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune niches in brain tumors: glial-immune cell interactions and spatial microdomains.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Review
- Association between PLVAP downregulation and increased lymphocyte infiltration in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab.Brain tumor pathology · 2026Article
- Precision Immunotherapeutics for Glioblastoma: Current Approaches and Emerging Strategies in 2026.Cells · 2026Review
- Integrative analysis identified the key role of LAG3 in T cell exhaustion in glioma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Local Nanomedicine and Nano-Enabled Biomaterials After Glioblastoma Resection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundT cell-based immunotherapies have had limited success in glioma thus far. Here, we evaluate the literature on abundance, spatial distribution and phenotypical characteristics of T cells in the tumor micro-environment (TME) of IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype glioma, with the aim to understand how these measures relate to immunotherapy resistance and to aid the development of immunotherapies for glioma.
methodsMedline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched up to May 6, 2025. Out of 4303 articles screened, 85 studies examining T cell immunity in human glioma were selected. We collected information about tumor subtype, grade, methods, T cell abundance, spatial distribution, phenotypes and prognostic significance.
resultsT cells are present in the glioma TME, but densities are heterogeneous and generally low, especially in IDH-mutant glioma. T cell abundance increases with higher WHO grade and upon recurrence. T cells cluster around blood vessels, especially in IDH-mutant glioma. Glioma-infiltrating T cells largely display a late-differentiated phenotype (CD45RA-CCR7-C62L-), expressing markers that signify sustained antigen activation and exhaustion (PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, CD39, and TIGIT). This phenotype coincides with decreased anti-tumor cytotoxicity and is spatially enriched in the myeloid-rich, hypoxic tumor core. Prognostic significance remains controversial.
conclusionsT cells in glioma are scarce, generally fully differentiated and functionally inert. Understanding and reinvigorating the deficient T cell response will be essential for successful immunotherapies. Future research should incorporate functional and spatial immune profiling to optimize and personalize immunotherapeutic strategies for glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.