ArticleNursing open2025
Nursing Management Experience of Acute Skin Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nursing Management Experience of Acute Skin Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore the management experience of acute skin failure (ASF) in critically ill patients from the perspective of nurses and provide references for improving clinical practice.
designA qualitative descriptive study.
methodsUsing purposive sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 ICU nurses in a tertiary hospital in East City, China, between January and March 2025. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological approach.
resultsFour main themes emerged: (i) Cognitive dilemmas; (ii) Disease control and risk identification; (iii) Management optimisation-from admission preparation to communication and (iv) Multidimensional exploration of nursing interventions. Nurses face challenges such as insufficient awareness, limited tools for early warning, fragmented communication and inadequate multidisciplinary collaboration. These findings suggest the urgent need for structured training, proactive care protocols and enhanced interdisciplinary coordination.
conclusionEffective ASF management requires institutional support to build a standardised, technology-enabled care model. Key priorities include tiered training programs for nurses, clearer interdisciplinary roles and the development of validated digital tools for assessment, documentation and real-time risk monitoring. Policymakers and hospital administrators should take concrete actions to strengthen ASF nursing capabilities and integrate systematic response mechanisms into routine care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: This study highlights the importance of empowering nurses through structured education, protocol development and digital innovation. Promoting a culture of proactive identification and collaborative care may improve early intervention and reduce adverse skin outcomes. Nursing professionals are encouraged to lead in the integration of ASF management into quality improvement and safety initiatives. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.