Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2025
Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05134480 (Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Endothelial Cell Loss
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Relationship between age, pseudophakia, diabetes mellitus and endothelial cell density in corneal donor tissue: a 10-year retrospective study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Factors Associated with Successful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study.Ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Air/gas migration after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): the impact of scleral-fixated versus posterior chamber intraocular lenses.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective: To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor's diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention: DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures: ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results: A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm2, respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = -0.4%; 95% CI, -2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm2, respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm2; 95% CI, -36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted (P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = -0.4%; 95% CI, -0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, -0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.