Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105099›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2025

Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jonathan H Lass, Beth Ann Benetz, David D Verdier, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Colleen E Bauza, Zachariah W Reed, Mark A Greiner, Shahzad I Mian, Sanjay V Patel, Sudeep Pramanik and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05134480 (Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05134480 nacompletednot on this map

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study (DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Endothelial Cell Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,097ConditionsCorneal Endothelial Decompensation, Fuchs' Endothelial DystrophyArmsDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jonathan H LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Beth Ann BenetzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Colleen E BauzaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Zachariah W ReedJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Mark A GreinerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City.
Shahzad I MianKellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Sanjay V PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sudeep PramanikMid Atlantic Cornea Consultants, Baltimore, Maryland.
Francis W PricePrice Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Mark C SoperVisionFirst, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Mark A TerryDevers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon.
Michael S TitusEversight, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Marianne O PriceCornea Research Foundation of America, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study Group

Funding

Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study(DEKS): Impact of Diabetes on Corneal Transplant Success and Cell LossUG1EY030039 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LASS, JONATHAN H, SZCZOTKA-FLYNN, LORETTA B · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective: To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor's diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention: DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures: ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results: A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm2, respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = -0.4%; 95% CI, -2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm2, respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm2; 95% CI, -36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted (P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = -0.4%; 95% CI, -0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, -0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480.

Indexed as

Corneal Endothelial Cell LossDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyEndothelium, CornealFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountDouble-Blind MethodEye BanksFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID41105099
PMCPMC12534859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.