Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105040›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Patient complaints differ for male and female obstetrician-gynecologists: an exploration of 20 years of complaints data in Alberta, Canada.

Erin A Brennand, Nancy Hernandez-Ceron, Iryna Hurava, Nicole Kain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erin A BrennandDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0500-6060
Nancy Hernandez-CeronResearch & Evaluation Unit, Analytics, Innovation & Research Department, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Iryna HuravaResearch & Evaluation Unit, Analytics, Innovation & Research Department, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nicole KainResearch & Evaluation Unit, Analytics, Innovation & Research Department, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient complaints are valuable indicators of systemic issues in healthcare, offering opportunities to enhance care quality and safety. Obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) is a specialty particularly prone to complaints, reflecting its unique challenges related to patient population, sensitive subject matter, and physician-patient dynamics. The impact of physician sex on patient complaints is not well understood, particularly taking into context the changing demographics of the OBGYN workforce.

methodsA longitudinal cohort of all obstetrician-gynecologists registered with the College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) between 2003 to 2024 linked to the CPSA Complaints database was used. Quantitative analysis included comparisons of mean and proportion, logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival, and Cox regression analyses to assess associations between physician characteristics and complaints. Adjusted models accounted for physician sex, birth year, and training location, measured using the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index as a proxy for healthcare system similarity to Canada. Content analysis categorized the anonymized complaint narratives provided insights themes of grievances.

resultsThe cohort included 449 OBGYN physicians (59.2% female, 40.8% male). Overall, 44.8% of physicians experienced at least one complaint during the study period. Male physicians were more likely to receive complaints than female physicians (52.5% vs. 39.5%), with higher adjusted odds of ethics-related complaints (aOR 2.16, 95% CI 1.12-4.16). Adjusted analyses revealed no significant differences in overall complaint frequency or time to first complaint between male and female OBGYNs. Content analysis highlighted recurring themes of communication, professionalism, and patient-centered care.

conclusionWhile crude analyses suggested sex-based differences in complaint patterns, these associations were attenuated after adjusting for physician age and training location, indicating that the total effect of sex on complaints may be mediated by these factors. However, male physicians remained more likely to receive ethics-related complaints even after adjustment, suggesting a possible direct association. These findings emphasize the need for targeted professional development focused on culturally sensitive communication and patient rapport and underscore the need to consider sex and gender dynamics in OBGYN to promote equity and improve patient care. Future research should explore systemic and structural contributors to complaint patterns across broader geographic and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsPatient SatisfactionPhysiciansAdultAlbertaFemaleGynecologistsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObstetriciansPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareSex FactorsComplaintDisciplinary actionGenderMedical RegulationRegulation

Identifiers

PMID41105040
PMCPMC12532309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.