ArticlePerfusion2026
Neuromonitoring and neuroprotection during neonatal aortic arch surgery: A United Kingdom and Ireland survey.
Article in Perfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in Understanding Brain Injury After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionNeonatal aortic arch surgery is associated with neurological morbidity of varying severity which is detected and potentially limited through neuroprotective strategies. We conducted a survey of healthcare professionals at all neonatal cardiac surgery centres in the United Kingdom and Ireland to determine current intraoperative neuromonitoring and neuroprotection practice.MethodsAn online cross-sectional survey was sent to congenital cardiac surgeons, cardiac anaesthetists, clinical perfusion scientists, and clinical neurophysiology professionals in all 12 level 1 paediatric cardiac surgical centres. Information was sought on their current clinical practice in neonates undergoing aortic arch surgery, including pharmacological management, cardiopulmonary bypass, acid-base and blood pressure management, neuromonitoring, and hypothermic circulatory arrest, and the feasibility and willingness to participate in a future clinical trial of neuroprotective strategies in these patients.ResultsWe received 55 (34%) responses, including representatives of all four clinical disciplines in 9 (75%) centres. Cooling to a nasopharyngeal temperature of 18°C before hypothermic circulatory arrest, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring are common practice, whereas pharmacology, acid-base management, blood pressure and flow parameters, and NIRS-based interventions vary. In 7 (58%) centres, respondents from all four disciplines were willing to consider participation in a future clinical trial on neuroprotection.ConclusionsAspects of intraoperative neuroprotection and neuromonitoring are common across centres, although key areas of practice differ between practitioners and institutions. Most respondents were willing to participate in a future multi-centre clinical trial, which suggests clinical equipoise in the optimal strategy to protect the neonatal brain during aortic arch surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.