Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105001›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Working With People With Experience of Psychosis to Co-Design an Educational and Anti-Stigma Psychosis Intervention for Schools.

William John Parrott, Mike Jackson, Anne Krayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William John ParrottSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-2510-6569
Mike JacksonNorth Wales Clinical Psychology programme, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anne KrayerSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-1734

Funding

This study was supported by Bangor University and the Economic and Social Research Council.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychosis is a particularly stigmatised condition in adolescent populations, with prevalent stigmatising beliefs surrounding it including negative stereotypes around dangerousness, unpredictability and chronicity. Additionally, the first episodes of psychosis increase significantly during late adolescence, and there is a lack of understanding and recognition of psychosis in young people. Given these factors, psychosis appears to be an important topic for mental health literacy and anti-stigma programmes. However, there is a lack of consensus surrounding the best way to construct psychosis anti-stigma interventions for young people. Voices of people with experience of psychosis seem crucial in this regard, but their experiences of stigma and discrimination are rarely heard. By including their perspectives along with those of other stakeholders, we aim to ensure that we gain a better, more balanced perspective on how to talk about psychosis with young people.

methodsThis study reports on the co-design process of a psychosis anti-stigma educational intervention for young people using the short-form Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP-2) checklist as a guiding framework. Six workshops were held over 3 months, with experts with experience of psychosis working with clinicians and academics. These workshops explored the differing views of these groups on how we understand, talk about and perceive psychosis.

resultsThis process resulted in an educational module named 'Reality and Psychosis', which we believe will prove effective in not only educating but also diminishing stigma surrounding psychosis among young people.

conclusionBy incorporating various perspectives, we hope to provide a well-rounded and balanced approach to addressing the complexities of discussing psychosis with young people. The GRIPP-2 checklist also proved to be a useful framework for assisting the reporting process. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Individuals with lived experience of psychosis participated throughout the co-design process. Specifically, they contributed to the six workshops by sharing their personal experiences of stigma, discrimination and recovery, which informed the development of the educational module. This helped ensure the voices of those directly affected by psychosis were authentically represented.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSocial StigmaAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsStereotypingadolescent mental healthco‐designlived experience perspectivemental health literacypsychosis stigma

Identifiers

PMID41105001
PMCPMC12532487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.