Observational studyPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2025
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Pediatric Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Pathway and Pulmonary Embolism Response Team.
Observational study in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesU.S. multicenter pediatric data from 2001 to 2014 indicate that the prevalence of pediatric pulmonary embolism (PE) is rising, yet it remains rare at individual centers. Evaluation and management vary due to the low frequency of events. And, therefore, we aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a clinical management pathway and PE response team (PERT) at our center.
designSingle-center observational implementation study with pre- vs. post-implementation comparisons.
settingQuaternary care pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients younger than 21 years old with acute PE who presented for care between January 2005 and August 2022 (pre-implementation) and between September 2022 and August 2024 (post-implementation).
interventionsImplementation of a PE clinical pathway and PERT. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsA PE clinical pathway and PERT were developed by a multidisciplinary team of pharmacists, quality improvement experts, and physicians from six clinical specialties. Electronic medical record tools were created to support the implementation of this pathway and PERT, and research and quality databases were created for ongoing evaluation. PE evaluation was standardized with the implementation of the PE clinical pathway. In the 23 months post-implementation, there have been 33 patients with acute PE (24 low-risk, seven intermediate-risk, and two high-risk PE), which we compared with our pre-pathway experience of 175 episodes. The proportion of patients who had laboratory testing with brain natriuretic peptide and troponin, or underwent echocardiogram during their admission increased, pre-vs.-post-implementation, respectively (50/175 vs. 30/33; p < 0.01; 55/175 vs. 30/33; p < 0.01; and 142/175 vs. 32/33; p < 0.02). The multidisciplinary PERT was successfully activated for seven patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE.
conclusionsImplementation of a pediatric PE clinical pathway and PERT improved standardization of PE evaluation and provided rapid multidisciplinary care for intermediate and high-risk PE. Future reports will evaluate both short- and long-term clinical outcomes in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.