ReviewCell transplantation
Stem cell-based regeneration therapies in stress urinary incontinence: Mechanisms, innovation, and challenges.
Review in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regenerative Medicine Approaches to Stress Urinary Incontinence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is characterized by the involuntary leakage of urine from the urethra due to increased abdominal pressure. The complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying SUI have driven the development of diverse therapeutic strategies. Current treatment options encompass both conservative and surgical interventions, with surgical approaches generally often regarded as the most effective option approach for severe cases. However, many surgical techniques carry significant risks of complications. In this context, urethral injection therapy, primarily based on stem cell-mediated regenerative approaches, has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. Stem cell therapies leverage their multipotent differentiation capacity and paracrine signaling pathways to directly target the pathophysiological contributors to SUI, including urethral sphincter dysfunction, neuromuscular junction degeneration, and imbalances in elastin and collagen homeostasis. This narrative review provides a critical evaluation of current stem cell-mediated regenerative strategies for SUI, focusing on cellular mechanisms and the therapeutic effects driven by paracrine signaling. Recent clinical advances, unresolved scientific controversies, and innovative combinatorial delivery systems incorporating targeted therapeutic approaches are analyzed. Despite challenges remain, such as determining the optimal stem cell dosage and improving in vivo survival rates, ongoing research offers valuable insights into the development of cell-free bioactive derivatives, advanced combination delivery systems, and precise molecularly targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.