SynthesisJournal of global health2025
Determining space requirements for small and sick newborns and their mothers in health facilities: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There are currently no World Health Organization and United Nations Children Fund benchmarks or 'norms' for scaling up small and sick newborn (SSN) service delivery in health facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Specifically, there is limited evidence on optimal bed space requirements in SSN units such as special care nurseries and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Through this systematic review, we aimed to gather evidence on the optimal space requirements needed for SSNs and their mothers in health facilities, particularly at level 2 district hospitals. Methods: We included simulation, experimental, and observational studies, as well as guidelines and formal expert opinion processes that described the optimal bed space for SSN units within any health facility. We searched Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), CENTRAL (via the Cochrane Library), CINAHL (via EBSCO), and LILACS from inception to October 2023. We assessed the quality of included studies using the RoB 2, ROBINS I, ROBINS E, and AGREE-II tools. We narratively described and synthesised all data. Results: We identified 10 574 studies and, after deduplication, screened 8453 titles and abstracts and assessed, followed by the full texts of 125 studies for eligibility. We included 12 reports which discussed three guidelines and one simulation-based study. All four came from high-income countries. Only one guideline specified the required bed space and floor space to be 2.8 m Conclusions: We found no studies describing space requirements for SSN units in LMICs and limited evidence for the optimal space requirements for open bay and mother-NICU beds in high-income countries. Much of the data reported was too heterogeneous to combine. More research, especially simulation studies, is needed to establish optimal space requirements for SSN units, including benchmarks that demonstrate functionality and the impact on infection control. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022378329.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.