ReviewJournal of global health2025
Steps taken by the World Health Organization African Region Member States to standardise herbal medicines: a literature review.
Review in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating the regulatory landscape of herbal medicines: A global comparison of India, China, Europe, the United States and Japan.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Standardised herbal products present a solution to the high burden of diseases and inadequate access to drugs in Africa. This literature review explores the steps that the Member States of the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa have taken to standardise herbal medicines. Methods: We retrieved publications from Google and Google Scholar search engines and through published and non-published information physically available at the WHO AFRO. The search terms to identify the publications were 'herbal medicine' OR 'traditional medicine' AND 'member state' between 2013 and 2023, where 'member state' stood for the individual names of the World Health Organization African region member states. We extracted information on the regulation, established structures in the ministry of health, registration systems, and research and training facilities on herbal medicines from the retrieved publications. Results: Member States have taken significant steps toward standardising herbal medicines through policymaking and research, such as clarifying the necessary regulatory framework; establishing a department, division, national office, or expert committee in their ministries of health; instituting a system for registering herbal medicines; and establishing research and training facilities for herbal medicine. However, only a few Member States have implemented all four aspects of herbal medicine standardisation and registration processes, with several of them lacking dedicated registration systems. Conclusions: The WHO AFRO Member States are steadily establishing systems for the standardisation and registration of herbal medicines. Those that have made strides in specific aspects of standardisation and registration, as highlighted in the country-by-country analysis, should serve as benchmarks to others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.