Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104746›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Remote automated delivery of mechanical stimuli coupled to brain recordings in behaving mice.

Justin Burdge, Anissa Jhumka, Ashar Khan, Simon Ogundare, Nicholas Baer, Sasha Fulton, Alexander Kaplan, Brittany Bistis, William Foster, Joshua Thackray and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Justin Burdge *Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Anissa Jhumka *Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Ashar KhanZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Simon OgundareZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Nicholas BaerZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Sasha FultonZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Alexander KaplanZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4634-4322
Brittany BistisZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
William FosterZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Joshua ThackrayCell Biology and Neuroscience Department, W.M. Keck Center of Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University in New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-452X
Andre ToussaintZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Miao LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Yosuke M MorizawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Jake NazarianUniversity of Illinois, Champaign, United States.
Leah YadessaZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Arlene J GeorgeCell Biology and Neuroscience Department, W.M. Keck Center of Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University in New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States.
Abednego DelinoisZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9071-8516
Wadzanayi MayiseniZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Noah LoranZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Guang YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-9126
David J MargolisCell Biology and Neuroscience Department, W.M. Keck Center of Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University in New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States.
Victoria E AbrairaCell Biology and Neuroscience Department, W.M. Keck Center of Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University in New Jersey, New Brunswick, United States.
Ishmail Abdus-SaboorZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2120-0063

Funding

Using Mouse Pain Scales to Discover Unusual Pain Sensitivity and New Pain TargetsDP2NS130454 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ABDUS-SABOOR, ISHMAIL JOHN · 2022 to 2023
$2.5M
Touching on locomotion: Olise Oputa Diversity Supplement_Nov 15R01NS119268 · NINDS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ABRAIRA, VICTORIA EUGENIA GUADALUPE · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Refining Oxytocin Therapy for Pain: Context is KeyR01NS124799 · NINDS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Victoria Eugenia Guadalupe Abraira · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
Rutgers Training in Addiction Research ProgramT32DA055569 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Robert Christopher Pierce · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Elucidating the Role of the vlPAG in Novel Pain-linked Escape Behavior Using C57 SublinesF31NS134275 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BURDGE, JUSTIN · 2024 to 2024
$37k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA055569NIH HHS 5T32DA055569-03NIH HHS F31NS134275NIH HHS R01NS119268NIH HHS R01NS124799NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS130454NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS134275NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119268NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The canonical framework for testing pain and mechanical sensitivity in rodents is manual delivery of stimuli to the paw. However, this approach is time-consuming, produces variability in results, requires significant training, and is ergonomically unfavorable to the experimenter. To circumvent limitations in manual delivery of stimuli, we have created a device called the automated reproducible mechanostimulator (ARM). Built using a series of linear stages, cameras, and stimulus holders, the ARM is more accurate at hitting the desired target, delivers stimuli faster, and decreases variability in delivery of von Frey hair filaments. We demonstrate that the ARM can be combined with traditional measurements of pain behavior and automated machine-learning-based pipelines. Importantly, the ARM enables remote testing of mice with experimenters outside the testing room. Using remote testing, we found that mice habituated more quickly when an experimenter was not present, and experimenter presence led to significant sex-dependent differences in paw withdrawal and pain-associated behaviors. Lastly, to demonstrate the utility of the ARM for neural circuit dissection of pain mechanisms, we combined the ARM with cellular-resolved microendoscopy in the amygdala, linking stimulus, behavior, and brain activity of amygdala neurons that encode negative pain states. Taken together, the ARM improves speed, accuracy, and robustness of mechanical pain assays and can be combined with automated pain detection systems and brain recordings to map central control of pain.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalBrainPainPain MeasurementPhysical StimulationAnimalsAutomationFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLbrainmouseneurosciencepainrobotsomatosensationvon Frey

Identifiers

PMID41104746
PMCPMC12534044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.