Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104703›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026

Undergraduate medical student exposure to OMFS, a future workforce concern-a narrative review of the literature.

I Perwaiz, A Mackenzie, U Rehman, M S Sarwar, P A Brennan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I PerwaizBradford Teaching Hospitals, UK.
A MackenzieCharing Cross Hospital, UK.
U RehmanUCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, UK.
M S SarwarBradford Teaching Hospitals, UK.
P A BrennanQueen Alexandra Hospital, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) is a surgical specialty dealing with a broad spectrum of pathology affecting the head and neck. Despite a rising burden of head and neck conditions, exposure to OMFS in the undergraduate medical curriculum remains limited. This has consequences for medical undergraduates' competence and confidence in managing related conditions and their recruitment into this specialty.

methodsA literature search was conducted in September 2024 on Pubmed, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, Cochrane and BMJ electronic databases for articles published between 1970 and 2024. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024556491).

resultsTen studies involving 2,499 participants were included. Only 33.1% of students had experience in OMFS, with variations in exposure type ranging from formal teaching sessions to clinical placements. Most exposures were brief, typically less than a week, and often did not extend beyond basic lectures or shadowing. A notable proportion of students expressed a desire for more comprehensive training in OMFS. Only 12.8-37% of participants were considering a career in OMFS. Low interest rates were attributed to dual qualification requirements, cost and duration of training.

conclusionsThe findings highlight a major gap in OMFS education delivered by medical schools. This is concerning given that OMFS in the UK is struggling to fill higher surgical training posts. If interest in the profession remains low, we may encounter a recruitment and workforce crisis. Future strategies must focus on meaningful opportunities to increase OMFS experience in the medical curriculum while addressing other barriers to recruitment and retention.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalSurgery, OralCurriculumHumansMaxillofacial surgeryOral surgeryUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID41104703
PMCPMC13529386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.