Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104632›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025

High-quality genome assembly of Chironomus riparius and its population history in European populations.

Laura C Pettrich, Robert King, Linda M Field, Ann-Marie Waldvogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura C PettrichInstitute of Zoology, Department of Biology, Universitat zu Koln, Zülpicher Straße 47b, Cologne 50674, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-0563
Robert KingRothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1828-9490
Linda M FieldRothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-2513
Ann-Marie WaldvogelInstitute of Zoology, Department of Biology, Universitat zu Koln, Zülpicher Straße 47b, Cologne 50674, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-0766

Funding

Bund-Länder ProgrammCollaborative Research Cluster 268236062DFG-funded INST 216/512/1FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aquatic midge Chironomus riparius is an established indicator taxon for the assessment of water quality as of the European Water Framework Directive. Here, we present a novel long-read genome assembly generated with PacBio HiFi and Hi-C sequencing, which achieves chromosome-scale resolution with an assembly size of 192 Mb, an N50 of 59 Mb, and a BUSCO completeness of 99.0%. Four chromosomes with their predicted centromeric regions and 10 unplaced scaffolds were assembled containing 15,439 protein-coding genes. Chromosome-level resolution in nonmodel species is often limited, posing challenges for population genomic studies that depend on high-quality reference genomes. Reanalyzing genomic data of natural C. riparius populations, we demonstrate the improved accuracy of population genomic estimators based on the high-quality reference genome. The high contiguity and completeness of the assembly enhanced demographic inference with Sequential Markovian Coalescent (MSMC2) modeling. Our results suggest that population divergence began in an ancestral lineage during the late Pleistocene to early Holocene, consistent with paleoclimate records from Central Europe.

Indexed as

ChironomidaeGenetics, PopulationGenomeGenome, InsectGenomicsAnimalsEuropePhylogenyChironomus ripariuschromosome-scale genome assemblydemographic inferencelong-read sequencingpopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID41104632
PMCPMC12693489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.