ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies
Effects of a Mind-Body Medicine Group Program for Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Integrative cancer therapies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehabilitation for patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment: results of a single-center pilot study using an integrative medicine day clinic.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Effects of a Mind-Body Medicine Group Program for Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study".Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
- Toward Precision Implementation of Mind-Body Medicine in Oncology: Insights From the "Mind-Body Medicine Group Program for Cancer Patients".Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
- Response to Thanchonnang et al - From Efficacy to Implementation - Critical Insights for Clinical Practice.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecent advancements in oncology have significantly improved cancer treatment outcomes and patient survival rates. Nonetheless, the therapeutic effects of cancer treatment often impair the patients' quality of life (QoL). The most common symptoms include fatigue, pain, sleep disturbances, depression, and anxiety. This study aims to assess the impact of a structured mind-body medicine (MBM) group intervention on these specific symptom domains in patients with cancer.
methodsA cohort of patients with cancer engaged in an 11-week MBM program (6 hours weekly, March 2016-August 2017), combining psycho-oncology, lifestyle medicine, and integrative approaches including mindfulness, nutrition counseling, and movement therapies. Participants' outcomes were evaluated for within-person (pre-post) changes using standardized questionnaires, including the Multidimensional Fatigue Index (MFI), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
resultsAssessments from 113 participants (94.7% female, 58.9% with breast cancer) revealed significant improvements (all
conclusionMBM programs may be a valuable addition to oncology care and they could improve patients' quality of life. Incorporating these programs into standard cancer treatment protocols could provide a more holistic approach that addresses both the physical and psychological facets of cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.