ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025
Characterizing Evoked Movement Patterns and Connectivity in Sensorimotor Cortex After Sensory Loss in Squirrel Monkeys.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing Evoked Movement Patterns and Connectivity in Sensorimotor Cortex After Sensory Loss in Squirrel Monkeys.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory feedback is crucial for movement execution, especially in the highly specialized skilled hand use in humans and other primates. Extensive sensory loss of tactile and proprioceptive inputs from the hand initially results in severe motor deficits, but recovery occurs gradually over time. To determine how sensory loss from one hand affects evoked forelimb movements from sensorimotor cortical areas, lesions were selectively placed in the ascending somatosensory pathway in the dorsal column in the cervical spinal cord (C5, DCL) of three squirrel monkeys. After 1 year of postlesion recovery, we examined the long-term effects of DCL on motor response patterns evoked by long-train intracortical microstimulation (LT-ICMS) from the hand cortex in primary motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory areas 3a, 3b, and 1 in both control and DCL groups. Somatosensory receptive fields were mapped primarily to define the borders of area 3b, as well as to compare somatosensory responses with motor responses after DCL. Corticocortical connections were investigated by injecting neuroanatomical tracers into the sensory-deprived forelimb regions of 3b and M1. We found that after somatosensory loss and compensation, LT-ICMS-evoked movement maps for M1 and deprived somatosensory areas did not show statistically detectable effects of DCL. Results were consistent with our earlier findings of the effects of long-term recovery from DCL on somatosensory response maps and connections among somatosensory areas. We now show that the effects of long-term DCL on evoked motor responses in somatosensory cortex were limited, while the connections between M1 cortex and somatosensory cortical areas were more widespread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.