ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The development of temporal cognition in hearing-impaired children and educational recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An experiment was conducted by temporal sequencing, selection, and judgment tasks to investigate the developmental characteristics of temporal cognition in hearing-impaired children and propose targeted educational strategies. Participants included 79 hearing-impaired students (aged 11-17) from special education schools, grouped into lower- (11-13 years), middle- (14-15 years) and upper-grade (16-17 years) cohorts. All participants had bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, used hearing aids regularly, and received structured auditory rehabilitation. Tasks assessed both concrete short-term sequences (e.g., water flowing in funnels) and integrated long-term sequences (e.g., seasonal cycles, abstract time concepts). Results revealed three key findings including: (1) Age-Related Progression. Temporal cognition in hearing-impaired children exhibited a clear developmental trajectory, with performance improving steadily with age. A rapid growth phase was observed in the middle-grade group (14-15 years), indicating a critical period for intervention; (2) Concrete vs. Integrated Temporal Cognition. Children demonstrated superior performance in short-term, concrete temporal tasks (e.g., daily routines) compared to long-term, integrated tasks (e.g., abstract time concepts or seasonal cycles); (3) Future-Oriented Bias: Future-oriented temporal cognition significantly outperformed past-oriented cognition, suggesting unique compensatory mechanisms in temporal reasoning. Time span, temporal representation, children's life experiences, and event complexity were important factors that affected the temporal cognitive development of hearing-impaired children. These findings underscore the need for tailored educational approaches that leverage visual-spatial strengths and experiential learning and inform auditory rehabilitation practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.