ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of action video game experience on visual selective attention in deaf middle school students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have shown that congenital deafness enhances peripheral visual processing but may reduce attention to central stimuli. In contrast, action video game experience has been shown to improve top-down attentional control and resistance to distraction. However, it remains unclear whether action video game experience can modify the peripheral attention bias typically observed in deaf individuals, particularly within the context of perceptual load theory. This question is crucial for understanding adaptive mechanisms and informing attention training interventions in the deaf population. Methods: To investigate the impact of action video game experience on visual selective attention in deaf middle school students, a response competition paradigm combined with eye-tracking technology was employed to systematically evaluate and compare the selective attention characteristics of four groups: deaf action video game players (Deaf VGPs), deaf non-video game players (Deaf NVGPs), hearing action video game players (Hearing VGPs), and hearing non-video game players (Hearing NVGPs). The comparison was conducted under varying levels of perceptual load and types of distractors. Results: (1) Deaf students generally demonstrated lower accuracy, slower reaction times, longer fixation durations, and more total fixation counts than their hearing counterparts in visual selective attention tasks. (2) Deaf VGPs performed better than deaf NVGPs, particularly in accuracy, and their performance in both accuracy and total fixation counts was comparable to that of their hearing counterparts, suggesting an association between action video game experience and enhanced selective attention in deaf students. (3) Deaf students, particularly NVGPs, exhibited larger compatible effects under both low and high perceptual load conditions, with the effect being more substantial under high load, indicating that perceptual load may exert a greater influence on deaf NVGPs. Conclusion: The mechanisms underlying selective attention processing in deaf students appear to be influenced by factors such as action video game experience and auditory deprivation-induced plasticity changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.