ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Optimizing academic engagement and mental health through AI: an experimental study on LLM integration in higher education.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence dependency in college students: a critical narrative review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In alignment with UNESCO's Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4), which advocates for inclusive and equitable quality education, the integration of Artificial Intelligence tools-particularly Large Language Models (LLMs)-presents promising opportunities for transforming higher education. Despite this potential, empirical research remains scarce regarding the effects of LLM use on students' academic performance, mental well-being, and engagement, especially across different modes of implementation. Objective: This experimental study investigated whether a guided, pedagogically grounded use of LLMs enhances students' academic writing quality, perceived mental health, and academic engagement more effectively than either unguided use or no exposure to LLMs. The study contributes to UNESCO's "Futures of Education" vision by exploring how structured AI use may foster more inclusive and empowering learning environments. Method: A total of 246 undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: guided LLM use, unguided LLM use, or a control group with no LLM access. Participants completed a critical writing task and standardized instruments measuring academic engagement and mental well-being. Prior academic achievement was controlled for, and writing quality was assessed using Grammarly for Education. Results: Students in the guided LLM condition achieved significantly higher scores in writing quality and academic engagement compared to the control group, with large and moderate effect sizes, respectively. Modest improvements in mental health indicators were also observed. By contrast, unguided use yielded moderate gains in writing quality but did not produce significant effects on engagement or well-being. Conclusion: The findings highlight the critical role of intentional instructional design in the educational integration of AI tools. Structured guidance not only optimizes academic outcomes but also supports students' wellbeing and inclusion. This study offers empirical evidence to inform ongoing debates on how digital innovation can contribute to reducing educational disparities and advancing equitable learning in the post-pandemic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.