Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104361›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of emergency medicine

Sudden death in the emergency department: A comprehensive 8-year study integrating clinical and autopsy data.

Tarik Akdemir, Adem Az, Yunus Doğan, Esma Akdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of emergency medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarik AkdemirDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-2274
Adem AzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-6185
Yunus DoğanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-6185
Esma AkdemirJustice Ministry, Council of Forensic Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5403-7447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients presenting with sudden, unexpected, and nontraumatic death to a high-volume tertiary emergency department in Türkiye, integrating clinical records with forensic autopsy findings.

methodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study including 1555 adult patients who presented with sudden death between January 2015 and January 2023. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and forensic autopsy reports. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to evaluate cause-of-death distributions by age, sex, and employment status.

resultsCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were the leading cause of sudden death (56.7%), followed by respiratory (12.8%) and infectious diseases (11.7%). Deaths due to central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, metabolic/endocrine disorders, and intoxications occurred at significantly younger ages (

conclusionOur findings confirm that CVDs remain the most frequent cause of sudden death. However, the significant presence of noncardiac causes, especially among younger and employed individuals, highlights the need for broader preventive strategies.

Indexed as

Autopsycardiovascular diseaseemergency departmentsudden death

Identifiers

PMID41104361
PMCPMC12527052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.